Thursday, December 01, 2011

Cherish the Child Foundation

On October 28th, 2011, Glenn Beck, a controversial Tv commentator, was invited to appear at a benefit for 'Cherish The Child Foundation', a Smoky Mountain Shelter For Abused Kids.

The evening program began with a half dozen musical renditions by "Voices of Lee", a very talented group of 16 young folks from University of Virginia, followed by Glenn Beck, who spoke passionately in behalf of these innocent children, terribly victimized by irresponsible parents and guardians. Mr. Beck spoke for 90 minutes, and he began by briefly explaining his own troubled youth;

This sensitive and detailed presentation provided the audience with a totally new perspective on the true nature of this complex gentleman, Glenn Beck.


The Message: Many thousands of children across our nation are in serious peril; many suffer from both physical and psychological damage from severe beatings, sexual assaults, etc, and over 7,000 each year will average of five each day.

IF YOU.. Are Moved To Help with a Donation, here's a direct line to Smoky Mountain Children's Home, Call 1-865-453-4644
{ print }

Links worth your time

A S/H Public Service Notice

Domestic "Violence" Hotline!

1-800-799-SAFE (7233)
1.3 Million American Women Each Year
Are Physically Abused by their
Husbands or Boyfriends!

Get Help ~ Call 911 ~ Report it

(Or Call Above D.V.H. Hotline, Now!)

The Wisest Mind Has Something Yet To Learn!

Tuesday, November 01, 2011


By Marshall Frank

I’m beginning to catch on to the strategy.

It’s like the shell game. Keep the public and the media watching the problems with the economy, while another sinister agenda is going on unchallenged and out of sight.

Meanwhile, the U.S. government may have killed a few despots and terrorists in foreign lands to make it look like a successful war against terrorism is being waged. The Obama-loving media likes that very much. Kudos to the president. Don’t look anywhere else.

Well, some of us do look elsewhere.

On September 1st, I wrote a detailed blog article about the Muslim Brotherhood’s successful infiltration and positions of trust they’ve gained in, of all places, the White House. This was first brought to my attention in a speech made by a secular Muslim, Tarek Fatah, in Canada where he warned people that Barack Obama was employing people connected to the Muslim Brotherhood in advisory positions of trust. When I investigated, I found it to be true. Here was my article then:


By now, I would hope most Americans are fully aware of who and what the Muslim Brotherhood stands for: Islamic domination on a global scale, either through violence or deception, while feigning to be moderate. There are hundreds of investigatory books and documents which have chronicled that fact.

Therefore, one would think that our president and his cabinet would be super alert and careful to prevent any risks to national security. Not only is that not happening, the risks to national security are being breached by the hour, every day, while we citizens and our media look the other way.

Fortunately, there are a few who are pressing the issue.

In addition to the Islamists named in my article on September 1st, we now learn from former FBI Agent, John Guandolo, that additional Islamists connected to the MB are working in other areas of government, including the Department of Homeland Security, namely Arif Alikhan and Koreem Shora, who is Janet Napolitano’s senior policy advisor. These , and others, have had close associations with sleazy Islamists and are deeply rooted in many Islamic organizations in the U.S. many of which have been identified as being formed by or closely aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood. There can be no good to come of this gross breach of national security. And, the world of radical Islam are getting everything they want.

For the full article, read:

Click here: Third Muslim Brotherhood Figure in Obama White House Identified, Plus in U.S. Navy

More. Recently, Janet Napolitano was grilled by Congressman, Louie Gohmert, of Texas, about hiring and swearing in Mohamed Elibiary as a Homeland Security Senior Advisor, with access to classified information and top secrets. Elibiary has allegedly been attempting to leak intelligence and shop classified information to the media. Elibiary was known to have attended a special honorary function where he gave a speech in support of Ayatollah Khomeini, the Irani cleric who radicalized Iran basically helped to start WW III. Napolitano played dumb.

This is what’s going on folks. If we can learn this much, there’s a lot more going on behind the scenes that we don’t know.

Click here: Rep. Louie Gohmert presses Napolitano over her granting security clearance to Mohamed Elibiary – Jihad Watch

Feeling safer?

And no one questions why Obama called for the removal of Hosni Mubarak from the rule over Egypt? Mubarak had declared the Muslim Brotherhood to be outlawed. Today, the Muslim Brotherhood is sitting pretty, poised to assume leadership over the Egyptian government.

And no one questions why Obama has called for Israel to return to 1967 borders, which fits perfectly into the Muslim Brotherhood goals.

Can’t anyone see what is happening here?

Meanwhile, keep your eye on the economy. Don’t look anywhere else, CNN, CBS, NBC, ABC, NY Times, Washington Post, etc., etc. You too, Fox News. If you’re going to report important information then get started. Herman Cain’s flirtations of the 1990s is all the headlines, while our government has got the fox guarding the hen house.

Then, there is the closest aid to Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State, in the form of Huma Abedin, who was raised in Saudi Arabia, and whose brother is aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood in Oxford, England, and mother is a member of the Muslim Sisterhood. This woman has access to the inner circle of security within our State Department. If she applied to be a local cop or FBI agent, she’d never get past the first round of security clearance. But she’s inside the State Deparment. And we don’t care?

Click here: Israpundit » Blog Archive » Obama intends to rule the World

Links worth your time

A S/H Public Service Notice

Domestic "Violence" Hotline!

1-800-799-SAFE (7233)
1.3 Million American Women Each Year
Are Physically Abused by their
Husbands or Boyfriends!

Get Help ~ Call 911 ~ Report it

(Or Call Above D.V.H. Hotline, Now!)

The Wisest Mind Has Something Yet To Learn!

Where Have
All The Leaders Gone?

Just as true today as it was when his book first came out. He was, and still is, a brilliant businessman!

Often we need to be reminded of Iacocca's words.

Remember Lee Iacocca, the man who rescued Chrysler Corporation from its death throes? He's now 82 years old and has a new book, 'Where Have All The Leaders Gone?'. Lee Iacocca Says:

'Am I the only guy in this country who's fed up with what's happening? Where the hell is our outrage with this so called president? We should be screaming bloody murder! We've got a gang of tax cheating clueless leftists trying to steer our ship of state right over a cliff, we've got corporate gangsters stealing us blind, and we can't even run a ridiculous cash-for-clunkers program without losing $26 billion of the taxpayers' money, much less build a hybrid car. But instead of getting mad, everyone sits around and nods their heads when the politicians say, 'trust me the economy is getting better..'

Better? You've got to be kidding. This is America' not the damned, 'Titanic'. I'll give you a sound bite: 'Throw all the Democrats out along with Obama!' You might think I'm getting senile, that I've gone off my rocker, and maybe I have. But someone has to speak up. I hardly recognize this country anymore.. The most famous business leaders are not the innovators but the guys in handcuffs.. While we're fiddling in Afghanistan , Iran is completing their nuclear bombs and missiles and nobody seems to know what to do. And the liberal press is waving 'pom-poms' instead of asking hard questions. That's not the promise of the 'America' my parents and yours traveled across the ocean for. I've had enough. How about you?

I'll go a step further. You can't call yourself a patriot if you're not outraged. This is a fight I'm ready and willing to have. The Biggest 'C' is Crisis! (Iacocca elaborates on nine C's of leadership, with crisis being the first.)

Leaders are made, not born. Leadership is forged in times of crisis. It's easy to sit there with thumb up your butt and talk theory. Or send someone else's kids off to war when you've never seen a battlefield yourself. It's another thing to lead when your world comes tumbling down. On September 11, 2001, we needed a strong leader more than any other time in our history. We needed a steady hand to guide us out of the ashes. A hell of a mess, so here's where we stand. We're immersed in a bloody war now with no plan for winning and no plan for leaving. But our soldiers are dying daily.

We're running the biggest deficit in the history of the world, and it's getting worse every day! We've lost the manufacturing edge to Asia , while our once-great companies are getting slaughtered by health care costs. Gas prices are sky rocking again, and nobody in power has a lucid plan to open drilling to solve the problem. This country has the largest oil reserves in the WORLD, and we cannot drill for it because the politicians have been bought by the flea-hugging environmentalists.

Our schools are in a complete disaster because of the teachers union. Our borders are like sieves and they want to give all illegal's amnesty and free healthcare. The middle class is being squeezed to death every day. These are times that cry out for leadership. But when you look around, you've got to ask: 'Where have all the leaders gone?' Where are the curious, creative communicators? Where are the people of character, courage, conviction, omnipotence, and common sense? I may be a sucker for alliteration, but I think you get the point. Name me a leader who has a better idea for homeland security than making us take off our shoes in airports and throw away our shampoo? We've spent billions of dollars building a huge new bureaucracy, and all we know how to do is react to things that have already happened.

Everyone's hunkering down, fingers crossed, hoping the government will make it better for them. Now, that's just crazy.. Deal with life. Name me an industry leader who is thinking creatively about how we can restore our competitive edge in manufacturing. Who would have believed that there could ever be a time when 'The Big Three' referred to Japanese car companies? How did this happen, and more important, look what Obama did about it!

Name me a government leader who can articulate a plan for paying down the debit, or solving the energy crisis, or managing the health care problem. The silence is deafening. But these are the crises that are eating away at our country and milking the middle class dry.

I have news for the Chicago gangsters in Congress. We didn't elect you to turn this country into a losing European Socialist state. What is everybody so afraid of? That some bonehead on NBC or CNN news will call them a name? Give me a break. Why don't you guys show some spine for a change? Had Enough? Hey, I'm not trying to be the voice of gloom and doom here. I'm trying to light a fire. I'm speaking out because I have hope I believe in America. In my lifetime, I've had the privilege of living through some of America's greatest moments. I've also experienced some of our worst crises: The 'Great Depression,' 'World War II,' the 'Korean War,' the 'Kennedy Assassination,' the 'Vietnam War,' the 1970's oil crisis, and the struggles of recent years since 9/11.

Links worth your time

Monday, October 17, 2011


By Marshall Frank

An old friend recently wrote me with these comments about the Tea Party and the Occupy Wall Street demonstrators:

“…non-violent protesters are being arrested for no reason. As for the … the tea party, the number one thing wrong with their mentality is that they are selfishly cruel; not giving a damn about the downtrodden of our society. They represent the worst of all human failings, narrow-minded ignorance.”

When I asked this friend to articulate what, specifically, makes the Tea Party “…selfish, cruel, uncaring of downtrodden, represent the worst of human failings, narrow-minded ignorance…” she did not, or could not be specific. I found the comments incomprehensible, particularly from an otherwise intelligent person, as though she was parroting the Left-Wing anthem by rote.

Many pundits compare the Occupy Wall Streeters to the Tea Party, but there is no legitimate comparison. And to claim that protesters are being arrested for no reason at all is more regurgitation of the party line, as though it were a script.

The Occupy Wall Street demonstrations could best be evaluated in Rep. Nancy Pelosi’s remark, “God bless them, for their spontaneity.” She said a mouthful.

First, in one sentence she revealed that the movement — which basically calls for America to evolve from capitalism to socialism — is supported and endorsed by the extreme left wing of the Democratic Party. And, considering that thousands of marchers could not undergo such a venture without substantial funding, it raises suspicion of where that money is coming from.

Second, by endorsing the demonstrations, she and other politicians like her, basically approve — de facto – of the actions of the demonstrators which has included the breaking of laws. Many hundreds have been arrested for blocking roads and bridges, dumping trash, vandalism and disorderly conduct.

Third, Mrs. Pelosi does the conservative right wing a great favor just by opening her mouth. Stating that these demonstrations are “spontaneous” is not only a lie, it insults the intelligence of every American who’s listening. The demonstrations are about as spontaneous as the Battle of Bull Run. The “spontaneous” comment was intended to manipulate the minds of Americans to give the marchers more innocence and legitimacy than they deserve.

Then again, it was Mrs. Pelosi who coined the brilliant remark regarding health care, “We have to pass the bill so you can find out what’s in it.”

Having served in Miami-Dade as a cop for thirty tumultuous years, I learned a lot about “spontaneous” street demonstrations, civil disobedience and violence. Riots and marches are never spontaneous. They are rooted in the back rooms of planners and agitators who plot strategy with a long range purpose to create change, good or bad.

Riots are usually instigated by a few, which catch fire and ignite the masses into violent behavior. As mobs escalate into a frenzy stage, some simply get out of control. That results in destruction of property, injury and sometimes worse.

It’s usually part of the strategy. Demonstrators and rioters intend on being arrested and hope to get their pictures taken in the process, all for the purpose of making the “establishment” look bad and to engender sympathy for their cause via media. Their bond money and legal fees are already pre-funded.

Many times, during street confrontations, I watched the behavior of demonstrators instantly change from passive to aggressive when the red light of television cameras came on. It was like Stephen Spielberg had just hollered “Action!”

Spontaneous? Hardly.

For police it’s the old “rock and a hard place.” They are compelled to act when laws are broken. Contrary to popular belief, police officers do not wake up every morning hoping to falsely arrest people in the streets. It’s a no choice situation.

Outside of ideology, the biggest differences between the Tea Party and the Occupy Wall Street groups are in outright signs and actions depicting bigotry and anti-Semitism by the Occupiers. Tea Party demonstrators do not espouse bigotry, racism or anti-Semitism) Check out the links below.

Then, there is the Egyptian fellow who was invited to speak, representing himself as an example of revolutionary change when he protested in his country earlier this year. What he didn’t tell anyone, was that those protests and uprisings were rooted in the Muslim Brotherhood, which is the most notorious, fundamentalist Islamist organization in the world with sights fixed on world domination. (See video below) So much for the pillars of Occupy Wall Street.

Meanwhile, Americans are constitutionally guaranteed the right to protest and assemble. Though I don’t agree with their message, demonstrators of Occupy Wall Street are exercising their rights so long as they are peaceful and do not break laws. Their goals and objectives are diminished, however, when they can’t respect the law and the rights of others.

Most would admit, some of their basic grievances are actually valid regarding jobs and the economy. But they are barking up the wrong street for redress. They should consider redirecting their protest marches from Wall Street to the White House, as suggested by Herman Cain.

Yes, the economy was slipping badly when Bush left office. This president has had almost three years to make a difference, and the hole keeps getting deeper.

Click here: Occupy Wall Street: Egyptian Activist (Video)

Click here: Exploiting anti-Semitism to destroy Occupy Wall Street | Opinion | Jewish Journal

Click here: The PJ Tatler » More Anti-Semitism at Occupy Los Angeles

Click here: Barack Obama Supports Occupy Wall Street – YouTube

Links worth your time

Sunday, October 09, 2011



Sir, Did you know that the Pentagon has warned your people that IRAN is waiting for you to pull All of our troops out of IRAQ? ...and there's an al-Queda Leader there with a $10 Million Dollar Bounty..Ibrahim Awwad Ibrahim Ali al-Badri, a.k.a. Abu Du'a.

I think you need to listen to Mitt Romney and Herman Cain when they say you need some business experience.

And, please tell your hippy friends to stop their Wall Street Protests. Not good P.R. sir. Oh yes, please..No more daily speeches on my T.V.

I believe you were correct..when you said the republicans are the "Party of No"

1. No to Dodd/Frank FannieMae/FreddieMac "sub-prime bank loans"

2. No to that ill-conceived Obama Health Care Plan

3. No to Mandated Nation-wide Health Insurance

4. No to another failed 'Stimulus Package' (the tax-payers are getting nervous.)

5. No to "Fast & Furious" Guns for Mexico's Drug Lords -- Replace Eric Holder.

6. No to falsely labelling Tea Party folks as "Racists"

7. No more giving "pep talks' to returning combat get the military vote.

8. No more "cold shoulder treatment" for Israeli P.M. Netanyahu, (he's a friendly).

9. No more telling foreigners that we are an arrogant nation.

10. No more Wall Street Protests; tell your goofy friends that we really need those INVESTORS to create JOBS!

11. No more White House Visits for George Soros & SEIU Union Boss Andrew Stern, and tell G/E Jeffrey Immelt to stop shipping his High-Tech Info to CHINA !!

12. Order Hillary dump her friend Huma Abedin Weiner - it's well known that Huma, her Mom & Brother have solid ties to the notorious MUSLIM Brotherhood!

Thanks for your attention, Mr President...and do tell your "Acting President Valerie Jarrett" that the old snake-hunter said hello. - Cordially, --- reb

Links worth your time

Saturday, October 01, 2011


By Marshall Frank

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

    — Presidential Oath Of Office

Preserving, Defending and Protecting the Constitution of the United States includes upholding statutes enacted by duly elected legislators at the state and federal levels.

There may be thousands of police chiefs in the United States who do not agree with laws against marijuana, prostitution and/or gambling. But according to the oath of his/her office, a chief is sworn to enforce the existing laws of the state and may not arbitrarily elect to ignore those to which he personally disagrees. If any chief ordered his officers to withhold making arrests for acts of statutory crime, he would be fired on the spot and banished from law enforcement.

A president — also a chief — does not, nor should he, have the authority to cherry-pick laws he wants to enforce, and those he does not. Just like local and state laws, it’s the congress’ job to enact laws, it is the executive branches of government’s job to enforce them.

William Jefferson Clinton faced impeachment for a moral violation which had nothing to do with his presidential policies and decisions, and therefore, no impact on the citizens of the country. Yet, the congress went after him voraciously trying to boot him out of office for a personal transgression that ended up mired in whether fellatio can be defined as an act of sex.

While the media focuses on the economy as Barack Obama’s likely downfall, the American people are becoming more aware each day of other nightmarish aspects of the Obama presidency, which the media continues to downplay.

This president has made decisions and policies that are negatively impacting all citizens of this country. Not only is he cherry-picking laws he doesn’t want enforced for political purposes, those decisions have jeopardized the security and safety of our citizens, the safety of our military and the safety of our closest ally: Israel.

Where do I begin?

1) Start with Aiding and Abetting the Breaking of Laws. In August of this year, the president signed an executive order authorizing the DOJ and other federal agencies to abstain from enforcing immigration laws. By doing this, the president has circumvented the legislative process after failing to gain enough support for his campaign toward immigration reform. That sends a message to law breakers that breaking the law will have no consequences. When there are no consequences for breaking laws, laws are guaranteed to be broken, thus further jeopardizing the security of our citizens. In every sense, this action fails to uphold the constitution.

In addition, Obama has bypassed Congress by using the back-door process to basically grant amnesty to over 300,000 illegal aliens and provide them with work permits. This is clearly a political act designed to garner future voters, and certainly not in the best interest of the citizens of United States.

2) The president, via his administrative subordinates, audaciously filed suit against the state of Arizona, then enjoined foreign bodies (the U.N.) and nations (Mexico) in seeking support against that sovereign state of the U.S. — our own citizens — who passed a lawful bill providing law enforcement with authority to ( get this) — ask for I.D. This is a mind blower.

A Police Officer’s fundamental job is to ask for I.D. from people who they see violating a law or traffic infraction. It is basic. Yet, the president disregarded the will of the people (70% in favor of the law). Furthermore, he ventured outside the borders of the country that elected him to seek support from other political bodies that did not elect him (some of whom hate the U.S.) to garner support for his position favoring illegal immigration. This is not protecting or defending the constitution. It is tantamount to treason.

(For those of you who parrot the suggestion that illegal immigration is a concern for federal officers only, ask yourself: Is the job of catching bank robbers limited to the FBI? Bank robbery is a federal crime, but local cops are duty bound to apprehend and arrest bank robbers… with the support of all citizens, including the federal government.)

3) Failing to adequately secure the borders of the United States from foreign invasion, in violation of Article IV, Section 4, of the Constitution. Despite pleas by citizens, sheriffs and state governors, the flow of illegal immigrants from Mexico, to and including drug dealers, thieves, robbers, rapists and terrorists, have been documented by law enforcement and the media. (This one could extend for several pages)

4) Publically calling for a return to pre-1967 borders, in support of the Palestinian position and against the hard-fast defensive position of the Israeli government, our supposed ally. When Israel pulled out of Lebanon and out of Gaza, they were met, not with peace, but with more rockets and murders. Thus, based on factual history, Israel’s unwavering position is that a return to old borders would be tantamount to national suicide. Yet, this president has disregarded the imminent danger that faces Israel and openly proposed a position that has emboldened Israel’s enemies.

5) Authorizing military engagement in acts of war within the Republic of Libya in March, 2011 without the approval of the Congress, violating Article 1, Section 10, Clause 3 of our United States Constitution. Also, the support of activities that would call for the assassination of another head of state. This was a country that did not attack — nor threaten to attack — the United States, nor our allies, which is a direct violation of engaging our resources in any military action against another country.

6) Employing persons with known alliances to the Muslim Brotherhood in the White House, presenting a breach of national security to the United States. Mounds of intelligence information exists, including evidence from the Holy Land Foundation trial, plus and evidence from foreign seizures by law enforcement, that identify the Muslim Brotherhood as an enemy of the United States, fully engaged in an active campaign of stealth jihad, with sights set on establishing an Islamic caliphate in the West, which — in other words — would spell the overthrow of our country. This, plus the employment of a trusted aid at the highest level within the State Department whose relatives have strong ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and the Muslim Sisterhood, represents and ignores a threat to national security.

7) Entering into an Agreement with Egypt’s rebels, headed by the Muslim Brotherhood, a foreign power, to sell 125 tanks, violating Article 1, Section 10, Clause 3 of our United States Constitution. To Wit: ” No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay.”

Authorizing the Attorney General of the United States to dismiss charges against members of the New Black Panther Party, charged with racially intimidating voters at a Philadelphia polling -place in 2008. Clearly, this was a violation of federal law for which the violators were duly charged. Dropping the case led to the angry resignation of a U.S. District trial attorney, in protest. This is another example of failing to enforce existing laws, and aiding and abetting law breakers in violation of the presidential oath of office.

9) Overseeing a federal program, “Operation Fast and Furious” authorizing illicit gun running and sales of 2,000-plus firearms to foreign insurgents (criminals) within Mexico, which has resulted in the deaths of more than one hundred victims, plus the killing of a Border Patrol agent. This case is still under congressional investigation which, if determined to be true, should head the list for impeachment of the president, i.e. aiding and abetting criminal activity, in violation of his oath of office.

10) April, 2009, the president authorized the release of four internal Justice Department memos on terrorist interrogation techniques, thereby emasculating anti-terrorist intelligence operations and endangering the lives of many agents. This was done contrary to the pleas and advice of his CIA director, four prior CIA directors and numerous other experts on covert operations. Whether the past practices were proper or not, this unnecessary release of information was not in the best interest of our national security. To the contrary, it added to its jeopardy and further emboldened our enemies to continue their terrorist conduct.

Anyone can scan “Google” where they will find many articles listing anywhere from five to fifty reasons why Mr. Obama should be impeached. This article doesn’t even touch on the issues of government take-overs of private banks and businesses, the misappropriation of funds and the corrupt arm-twisting that led to persuading some senators to vote for a bill they were opposed to, until special favors were awarded. Nor did this article mention how special interest groups — supporters of the president — were categorically excluded from the new Health Care mandates, including unions and certain religious groups. Nor does it address the Solyndra scandal — still under scrutiny — pertaining to the utter waste of a half billion tax dollars bailing out a private corporation that went bankrupt a year later. Nor does it mention the still-pending question of Obama’s legitimacy as a sitting president, and the mystery surrounding his social security number — registered in Connecticut — that belongs to dead man.

This article could extend four times this length if I was to touch on everything that reeks rotten about Barack Obama, including his sordid associations of his pre-senatorial years. Any one of these concerns listed (above), if not impeachable are at the least egregious and un-American and at the most, illegal. No president in history has engendered so much distrust, animosity and outright fear of his hidden motives for holding the most important office in America. Other presidents may have been less successful, less competent and overly political, but none were ever suspected of being utterly un-American and disloyal to the constitution, or in cahoots with enemies of the United States.

These sentiments are shared by millions of Americans, not limited to Republicans or Tea Party groups. Just start Googling — the disgust is showered all over the Internet by those who choose to read beyond the New York Times. Hopefully, that will translate to new blood in the Oval Office in 2012.

This is not a Republican/Democrat issue. This is an issue concerning national security and the future stability for our children, regardless of party. No matter who opposes Obama in 2012, (if he is not already impeached) it is imperative to all America that he is ushered out of the White House and into historical oblivion. There should never be a statue of him erected anywhere in the United States, including Washington D.C. – not by taxpayer funds anyway.

I’ll list a few links, there are scores more if you want to go digging.

A video letter to Barack Obama:

Click here: #t=19


Click here: Metcalfe: Obama “Treasonous” on Immigration | PoliticsPA">

Click here: Rep. Issa: Justice Dept. Not Cooperating on ‘Fast and Furious’

Click here: ‘Fast and Furious’ Explodes: Brian Terry Cover-Up,

Click here: State Department Reported Arizona to the United Nations.

Click here: Mexico Joins Suit Against Arizona’s

Click here: Despite revolution, US set to approve ta… JPost – International

Click here: Obama’s Hafiz, Rashad Hussain, Muslim Brotherhood in the White House

Click here: Obama’s Muslim Brotherhood Ties – HUMAN EVENTS

Click here: INFILTRATING THE WHITE HOUSE | Marshall Frank

Click here: Adams: ‘Lawless’ Civil Rights Division Dismissed Black Panther Case

Click here: Former congressman: 12 reasons to impeach Obama

Links worth your time

Sunday, September 11, 2011

The 9/11 Anniversary Question"

Question: Can you trust a "moderate muslim"?

Answer: IF a muslim friend or acquaintance faces Mecca to Pray... that person's holy book explicitly instructs true believers that It Is Acceptable to Lie (Taqiyya) with Nnash (nullify, with religious permission) to non-believers, pagans and infidels, for the purposes of conversion, or at the very least to subdue them, then to dominate them with terror, or to kill them.

Read The Holy Qur'an

Allah's Apostle said, "I have become victorious with terror." Bukhari, Vol 4, Book 52, #220

"War is Deceit" - Bukhari, Vol 4, Book 52, #269

"I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore, strike off their heads, and strike off every fingertip of them." - Qur'an 8:12

"Fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and lie in wait for them in every strategem of war. - Qur'an 9:5

Be Not Deceived; Stay Vigilant! When the moderate imam is invited to your town to preach tolerance and "peace", and says he wants to love you, and asks you to help him build those "bridges to understanding" with Islam, he speaks with the forked tongue of deception. - reb

Links worth your time

Thursday, September 01, 2011

Is There Any Doubt

Is There Any Doubt....

That the Muslim Brotherhood has successfully infiltrated our universities & churches, and now the U.S. State Department?

Are American citizens so apathetic as to be willfully blinded by partisan politics to the degree that they are unwilling to confront elected officials like Sec Of State Hillary Clinton, when the fact- based evidence is overwhelming? - Read Article Below & Weep. - reb

Weiner Fallout And The Muslim Connection
                 by Marshall Frank

The fallout from the Anthony Weiner fiasco includes a mystery no one yet has resolved, especially the media which is ignoring it like the plague. Make that: Two mysteries*

Mystery # 1) How is it that Anthony Weiner, a Jew, married a devout Muslim woman, and vice-versa?

Mystery #2) How is it that a devout Muslim woman with strong ties to the notorious Muslim Brotherhood is working within a trusted position in the highest levels of the Department of State?

Here are the facts as we know them:

1. - Anthony Weiner, a Jewish U.S. Congressman from New York, (now resigned) married Huma Abedin, a practicing Muslim woman, in 2010.

Ex-President Bill Clinton officiated.

2. - Huma Abedin was born in Michigan, but grew up in Saudi Arabia, the daughter of devout Muslim parents. She was later educated in the U.S. and remains a devout, practicing Muslim.

3. - At age 20, Huma Abedin started working as a White House assistant to then first lady, Hillary Clinton in 1996, and has been by Mrs.. Clinton's side ever since. She now holds the position of Aide and Deputy Chief of Staff to Sec. Hillary Clinton in the State Department.

4. - According to numerous sources, which has not been denied or refuted, the mother of Huma Abedin - a Pakistani - is a member of the Muslim Sisterhood, or, the women's division of the MuslimBrotherhood.

5. - Huma Abedin's brother is a fellow with the Oxford Centre For Islamic Studies, which is heavily supported by the Muslim Brotherhood.

6. - Islamic scholars and experts confirm that no Muslim woman - especially devout Muslims and members of the sisterhood - may marry a non-Muslim man, yet a Jew, unless that man has converted to Islam.

7. - It is well known, especially in intelligence circles including the CIA and the FBI, that the Muslim Brotherhood is the most notorious global, anti-American, jihadist organization in the world, with long range sights set upon establishing an Islamic caliphate in the west. (That means, converting America into an Islamic nation, folks). According to their own documents - authored by the highest levels in the MB - America is destined to be settled as an Islamic nation, and that it will use deceit and infiltration to accomplish this goal from within. FROM WITHIN! Readers tend to gloss over this, but it is as important as Mein Kampf was to the burgeoning Nazi movement in 1930s Germany that so many ignored. You've read it before. Here, again, is their language taken from the Muslim Brotherhood manifesto, introduced at the Holy Land Foundation trial:

"The process of settlement is a "Civilization-Jihadist Process" with all the means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah's religion is made victorious."


The Muslim Brotherhood - or its affiliations - has infiltrated the highest levels of our government.

Hillary Clinton is either in denial, stupid, naive or complicit in having such a person with ties to the MB working within the highest levels of the State Department. That goes for the president as well.

There is certainly more to the story of the Weiner wedding, which we don't know about. If Anthony Weiner, in fact, converted to Islam, it was done surreptitiously because it would have been a death knell to his political career. And, if so, Weiner certainly knew of the Muslim Brotherhood connections of his wife.

If the Islamic community has approved of, or ignores the marriage between Jewish born Weiner and Huma Abedin, it can be logically concluded that they - the Islamic community - know something we don't. An Imam from the Islamic Cultural center of New York, Omar Abu-Namous, not only approved of the union, he has encouraged Huma Abedin to stand by her man during the cybersex scandal. Thus, it must be advantageous to the goals of Islamic jihad and the MB to have Huma Abedin inside the bowels of the Department of State with daily access to governmental intelligence. Therefore, her "marriage" to a U.S. congressman, regardless of religion, was openly accepted.

That, folks, is an example of "Taqiyya" which I've often written about. Taqiyya is the Islamic equivalent to using lies, deceit and concealment in order to advance the cause of spreading Islam. The 9/11 al Qaeda terrorists blended with American society for months prior to the deadly attack, drinking alcohol, carousing with women and eating pork, in order to conceal who they truly were, in order to carry out their mission.

Their mission was to infiltrate and kill. The mission of the Muslim Brotherhood is to infiltrate and conquer, even if it takes 100 years. In the Muslim Brotherhood planning document, "The Project," it clearly states - among their strategies: Maintain the appearance of moderation. Use deception to mask the intended goals of Islamic Action. We know about these things, the government knows about these things, the highest of officials know, yet they are inexplicably ignored.

Forget about the war in Afghanistan and Iraq. We are losing the war right here. And our government is helping. ( End of Article )


Links worth your time


The Wisest Mind Has Something Yet To Learn!

Friday, July 01, 2011

Weiner's Wife, Hillary's Factotum,
and the Muslim Brotherhood

The Muslim Brotherhood and Weiner
By Eileen F. Toplansky

Part I

Far more disturbing than the salacious details of Weiner's dalliances {the N.Y. Congressman's e-Mailed photo of his weenie} is the fact that apparently his mother-in-law is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood. Furthermore, Huma Abedin's brother, Hassan, "is listed as a fellow and partner with a number of Muslim Brotherhood members." Hassan works at the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies (OCIS) at Oxford University. The Egyptian Al-Azhar University, well-known for a curriculum that encourages extremism and terrorism, is active in establishing links with OCIS.

How is it that the Western media, with its hourly analyses of Weiner, missed this salient point, yet Arab news sources revealed this connection? Walid Shoebat, formerly with the PLO, explains that Saleha Mahmoud Abedin, a professor in Saudi Arabia "belongs to the Sunni movement's women's division known as the Muslim Sisterhood." During the recent uprising in Egypt, which resulted in Mubarak's removal, "a special women's unit within the Muslim Brotherhood served as 'mules' to deliver messages and acted as messengers for the terrorist group."

The Muslim Sisterhood is also known as the International Women's Organization (IWO) and members are located "across 16 different countries." Its goal is to "work at all levels in accordance with the message of the Brotherhood." The Muslim Brotherhood's goal is Islamic World Domination and "[i]t is now public knowledge that nearly every major Muslim organization in the United States is actually controlled by the [Muslim Brotherhood] like CAIR, or a derivative organization. Consequently, most of the Muslim-American groups of any prominence in America are now known to be, as a matter of fact, hostile to the United States and its Constitution."

This chart on page four of the Domestic Intelligence Briefing by Mark Hass shows the FBI - Identified Terror Networks connected to the Muslim Brotherhood in North America.

Which should now raise even greater concerns since Huma Abedin-Weiner is the deputy chief of staff to Hillary Clinton, the United States Secretary of State. Did any vetting occur by Clinton's people concerning Huma Abedin, her brother Hassan, or her mother Saleha Mahmoud Abedin, and any connections with known Islamists, particularly the Muslim Brotherhood?

But then again, would it have troubled Mrs. Clinton? After all, during her husband's time as President, she warmly embraced Suha Arafat the wife of Yasser Arafat, arch-terrorist, right after a speech during which Suha Arafat falsely accused Israel of poisoning the Palestinian water supply.

Huma's brother has "worked with Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal on a program of "spreading Islam to the west." More intriguing is the fact that the Abedin family left Michigan for Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, around 1977, which is the same year that the Muslim Sisterhood was formed.

Couple this with the Clinton family playing a key role in promoting Fethullah Gulen who has worked assiduously to overthrow Turkey's secular government. Gulen, who currently resides in Pennsylvania, has told his followers that in order for "worldwide Islamic domination to succeed, every method and path is acceptable, including lying to people."

In March of this year, the FBI was investigating the more than 120 charter schools in the United States that are linked to Gulen's movement. These schools, funded with millions of taxpayer dollars, promote Gulen's worldview that is both anti-Israel and anti-America. In fact, in 2010 it was reported that Bill Gates had given almost 11 million dollars to the Cosmos Foundation, which is a Gulen enterprise.

Moreover, one needs to question why Huma Abedin, a member of a family of devout Muslims, would ever marry a Jewish Congressman -- in a ceremony officiated by Bill Clinton. Sharia law clearly forbids {female} Muslims from marrying non-believers, so what does this portend?

Furthermore, when Huma Abedin accompanied Hillary Clinton to the Dar El-Hekma women's college in Saudi Arabia, where Huma's mother is co-founder and vice dean, it was reported that "Hillary explained that Huma holds an important and sensitive position in her office." Where was the scrutiny?

Why are so many at the highest levels of American government ignoring the methodology of Islamists like Gulen, who has declared that the best way to seize power is to lie in wait "with the patience of a spider" in order to "wait for people to get caught in the web"? Is Clinton so naïve?

Thus, Huma Abedin's position with Clinton in the State Department, as well as her marriage to Representative Weiner, has given her enormous exposure "to state secrets and access to the inner workings of Congress."

This would be unsettling enough if it were not also for Obama's latest appointee. The 44th president has just appointed Azizah al-Hibri to the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom. Al-Hibri believes that sharia law is superior to American law. Yet, al-Hibri is only one of the pro-sharia adherents that Obama has placed in influential positions since he became president. Dalia Mogahed was one of the earliest appointees and as Nonie Darwish has written, "[t]he empowerment of Radical Islam under the Obama administration" is extremely disturbing.

Last year, Obama appointed two devout Muslims to Homeland Security. Obama's record concerning Islamic terror was alarming from the beginning of his term and it has only become more entrenched. Congressman Keith Ellison aka Keith Hakim, who converted to Islam, is already in place in Congress. His connections to CAIR are troubling.

Is the Weiner scandal really covering up a far more disturbing scenario whereby jihadists continue to infiltrate and influence American universities, military installations, homeland security, even local police forces, all while the press ignores the steady encroachment of these radicals who seek to overturn and destroy America?

The disgraceful indifference by the general press to Weiner's in-laws and their connections to the Muslim Brotherhood keeps eroding America's ability to rout those who wish to see her destroyed.

Fethullah Gulen has exhorted his followers to "move in the arteries of the system without anyone noticing [their] existence until [they] reach all the power centers...until the conditions are ripe..." Can America continue to close its eyes to this deliberate hibernation strategy of our enemies?

Eileen can be reached at

Weiner’s In-Laws’
Secret Muslim Brotherhood Connections

How deep do the ties go?
by Walid Shoebat and Ben Barrack

Part II

Was Huma Abedin — wife of Anthony Weiner and deputy chief of staff to Hillary Clinton — unaware that her mother was reported as a member of the Muslim Brotherhood? Did Western media miss what has been revealed in several Arab newspapers and left secret in American government circles?

Al-Liwa Al-Arabi (translated here) claims to have leaked an extensive list, partially published by Al-Jazeera and several other major Arab newspapers, that includes Huma’s mother, Saleha Abedin, in the Brotherhood’s secret women’s division — known as the Muslim Sisterhood or International Women’s Organization (IWO).

Information about the IWO can readily be found at the Muslim Brotherhood’s official website. An excerpt from its goal, translated from the Arabic, states:

The Women Organization’s goal, in accordance with the Muslim Brotherhood rules, is to gain and acquire a unified global perception in every nation in the world regarding the position of women, and the necessity of advocacy work at all levels in accordance with the message of the Brotherhood, as written in Women in Muslim Society, and the rearing of women throughout the different stages of life [emphasis added].

The Egyptian paper Al-Dostor revealed that the Sisterhood includes 63 international members across 16 different countries — a claim confirmed by the Arab Center for Studies, headed by researcher Abdul Rahim Ali.

Neither Huma nor any major Western media outlets even mention this bit of common knowledge in the Arab world.

But there is more. Also confirmed by Arab sources is that Huma Abedin has a brother who works at Oxford University named Hassan Abedin. Oxford, which has long been infiltrated by Islamists who founded the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies (OCIS), has Huma’s brother listed as a fellow and partner with a number of Muslim Brotherhood members on the Board — including al-Qaeda associate Omar Naseef and the notorious Muslim Brotherhood leader Sheikh Yusuf Qaradawi. Both have been listed as OCIS trustees. Naseef continues to serve as Board chairman.

In 2009, Qaradawi’s role within Oxford and the Muslim Brotherhood was championed by the notorious Sheikh Rached Ghannouchi of Al-Nahda – a Muslim Brotherhood affiliate now active in Tunisia. OCIS has even presented an award for great scholarly achievement to Brotherhood member Shaykh Abd Al-Fattah Abu Gudda, whose personal history goes back to the Brotherhood’s founder, Hasan al-Banna.

Even the Sunday Times acknowledges that the cradle of Islamic jihad — Al-Azhar University — actively attempts to establish links with OCIS, where Huma’s brother serves.

Was Huma unaware of all this as she accompanied Hillary Clinton to the Dar El-Hekma women’s college in Saudi Arabia? Huma’s mother is co-founder and vice dean at the college and an active missionary on issues regarding Muslim women.

Another member listed as belonging to the Sisterhood mentioned by Al-Jazeera is Suheir Qureshi. Alongside Huma’s mother, Saleha Abedin, as well as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who was brought in due to her connection with Huma, Qureshi spoke on issues of women in Muslim society. An Arabic news report of what happened during Hillary’s visit stated that:

Suheir Qureshi spoke of how elated she was of Hillary’s historic visit…. Saleha Abedin spoke after Suheir Qureshi and beamed in the presence of Secretary Clinton. Saleha’s speech preceded the former first lady’s. Then Hillary stood. She donned a broad smile as she approached the podium….Clinton started with a strong word and she spent a long time complimenting Dr. Saleha Abedin regarding her daughter. Hillary explained that Huma holds an important and sensitive position in her office. She ended her speech by speaking of Saleha Abedin’s daughter (Huma), that a person must be happy if mentioned in a positive light but there is no happiness that equals the compliment given to children in front of a parent [emphasis added].

It is sacrilege in Islam for Huma’s mother to accept the reality that her daughter is married to a Jew. Yet neither Saleha nor Huma’s brother Hassan denounces her marriage to Weiner, especially when it was considered null and void by some of the highest authorities on Islamic Sharia rulings.

Huma’s brother has been key in furthering the Islamic agenda and has worked with Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal on a program of “spreading Islam to the west.” A detailed report from 2007 shows that Naseef was identified as the likely force behind the Abedin family’s departure from Kalamazoo, Michigan, to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, circa 1977 – the same year that the Muslim Sisterhood was established.

In 2008, Dr. Mumen Muhammad wrote about why Huma vowed to stay with Hillary even if the latter were to lose the presidential nomination to Obama:

Abedin assures in press releases of her continuance on the path with Hillary Clinton, even if Clinton failed as a candidate. The candidate’s aides and other influential figures in the Democratic Party assure that they do not disregard Abedin running for election or taking her position in the political arena with the help in successive political administrations of the Clinton family itself [emphasis added].

Hillary Clinton signed a document less than one month prior to her trip to Saudi Arabia with Huma that lifted the ban on Tariq Ramadan, allowing him entry into the United States. (Ramadan is the grandson of the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, Hasan al-Banna, and has ties to Islamic terrorist groups.) The Clinton family played a key role in promoting Fethullah Gülen, the extremely powerful Turkish imam and notorious Islamist conspirator, as he fled Turkey for the United States after attempting to overthrow Turkey’s secular government. (He was indicted on this charge in 2000.) In 2008, the former president heaped praise on Gülen, giving him a clean slate. Gülen has been given refuge and has even had sermons aired on Turkish television during which he explained to his followers how to best seize power from the Turkish government:

"You must move in the arteries of the system without anyone noticing your existence until you reach all the power centers… until the conditions are ripe….Until that time, any step taken would be too early — like breaking an egg without waiting the full forty days for it to hatch. It would be like killing the chick inside" [emphasis added].

Gülen expressed this sentiment in another sermon as well:

"The philosophy of our service is that we open a house somewhere and, with the patience of a spider, we lay our web to wait for people to get caught in the web; and we teach those who do." [emphasis added].

Serving with Huma’s brother as an Oxford Centre trustee is Abdullah Gül, Turkey’s president himself. He considers himself a follower of Fethullah Gülen, according to Wikileaks.

Huma Abedin’s charm, family connections, and access to highly sensitive state secrets — as admitted by Hillary herself — can have significant consequences. {End of Two Part Article}

Acknowledgements to Our Sources: To: Dan Friedman's Top Copy, NYC - Also, to American Standard (Part I) and to Pajamas Media (Part II), and to their authors. The capstone to all of the above evidences are the potent wordings found here:

The Muslim Brotherhood's Creed
Hizb al Ikhwan al Muslimin

Allah is our Objective, The Prophet is our Leader, the Qur'an is our Law; Jihad is our Way, and Dying in the way of Allah* is our Highest Hope."
* suicidal shahid martyrdom

{ Print, Photo-Copy & File For Future Discussion. }


Links worth your time

A S/H Public Service Notice

Domestic "Violence" Hotline!

1-800-799-SAFE (7233)
1.3 Million American Women Each Year
Are Physically Abused by their
Husbands or Boyfriends!

Get Help ~ Call 911 ~ Report it

(Or Call Above D.V.H. Hotline, Now!)

The Wisest Mind Has Something Yet To Learn!

Wednesday, June 01, 2011

A Better Place?

EVERY HUMAN MUST SEE understand the obscene opulance of Saudi Arabia, and the arrogance coming from these Oil-rich Potentates through their ancient religious notions of... devine superiority.
  This is the graphic story of vast wealth, and the life-styles of those who have it, and those who have nothing at all.





Understand...that these graphic pictures clearly illustrate what happens to Innocents when Jihad Arrogance is Allowed to Invade Any Sovereign Nation...pretending 'Peace and Love'.

Their "moderate imams" preach Diversity..and 'Building Bridges to Understanding' and 'Co-existance'! Beware the Pious Posturing of these Soft-Speaking Con-Men...they utter much that is complete nonsense, and they speak with a forked tongue!

To make 'A Better Place', to heal the sickness of a suffering world..Start by informing yourself, then family & neighbors. Read the Violent Verses in the Holy Qur'an, then you will.. begin to understand.
YOU can make this a far better place, for you and for me, and the entire human race. People are dying;
If you care enough for the living, You can help make the difference. You can participate in making this planet a better place, for...Future Generations Everywhere.

IF there are lingering doubts, you are urged to read the 'Muslim Brotherhood Creed', Egypt, 1928. If more is needed, then read the 'Hamas Charter' of Suicidal Hatred of Jews.. and all of the other "non-believers".

Thank You. - reb

Friday, May 13, 2011


by Sarah Roman on May 5, 2011 at 12:53pm


"What Valerie Jarrett, and the president, did not know is that Leon Panetta had already initiated a program that reported to him –and only him, involving a covert on the ground attack against the compound."

Note:This update comes some 24 hours after our longtime Washington D.C. Insider first outlined shocking details of an Obama administration having been “overruled” by senior military and intelligence officials leading up to the successful attack against terrorist Osama Bin Laden. What follows is further clarification of Insider’s insights surrounding that event.

Q:You stated that President Obama was “overruled” by military/intelligence officials regarding the decision to send in military specialists into the Osama Bin Laden compound. Was that accurate?

A: I was told – in these exact terms, “we overruled him.” (Obama) I have since followed up and received further details on exactly what that meant, as well as the specifics of how Leon Panetta worked around the president’s “persistent hesitation to act.” There appears NOT to have been an outright overruling of any specific position by President Obama, simply because there was no specific position from the president to do so. President Obama was, in this case, as in all others, working as an absentee president.

I was correct in stating there had been a push to invade the compound for several weeks if not months, primarily led by Leon Panetta, Hillary Clinton, Robert Gates, David Petraeus, and Jim Clapper. The primary opposition to this plan originated from Valerie Jarrett, and it was her opposition that was enough to create uncertainty within President Obama. Obama would meet with various components of the pro-invasion faction, almost always with Jarrett present, and then often fail to indicate his position. This situation continued for some time, though the division between Jarrett/Obama and the rest intensified more recently, most notably from Hillary Clinton. She was livid over the president’s failure to act, and her office began a campaign of anonymous leaks to the media indicating such. As for Jarrett, her concern rested on two primary fronts. One, that the military action could fail and harm the president’s already weakened standing with both the American public and the world. Second, that the attack would be viewed as an act of aggression against Muslims, and further destabilize conditions in the Middle East.

Q: What changed the president’s position and enabled the attack against Osama Bin Laden to proceed?

A: Nothing changed with the president’s opinion – he continued to avoid having one. Every time military and intelligence officials appeared to make progress in forming a position, Jarrett would intervene and the stalling would begin again. Hillary started the ball really rolling as far as pressuring Obama began, but it was Panetta and Petraeus who ultimately pushed Obama to finally act – sort of. Panetta was receiving significant reports from both his direct CIA sources, as well as Petraeus-originating Intel. Petraeus was threatening to act on his own via a bombing attack. Panetta reported back to the president that a bombing of the compound would result in successful killing of Osama Bin Laden, and little risk to American lives. Initially, as he had done before, the president indicated a willingness to act. But once again, Jarrett intervened, convincing the president that innocent Pakistani lives could be lost in such a bombing attack, and Obama would be left attempting to explain Panetta’s failed policy. Again Obama hesitated – this time openly delaying further meetings to discuss the issue with Panetta. A brief meeting was held at this time with other officials, including Secretary Gates and members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but Gates, like Panetta, was unable to push the president to act. It was at this time that Gates indicated to certain Pentagon officials that he may resign earlier than originally indicated – he was that frustrated. Both Panetta and Clinton convinced him to stay on and see the operation through.

What happened from there is what was described by me as a “masterful manipulation” by Leon Panetta. Panetta indicated to Obama that leaks regarding knowledge of Osama Bin Laden’s location were certain to get out sooner rather than later, and action must be taken by the administration or the public backlash to the president’s inaction would be “…significant to the point of political debilitation.” It was at that time that Obama stated an on-ground campaign would be far more acceptable to him than a bombing raid. This was intended as a stalling tactic, and it had originated from Jarrett. Such a campaign would take both time, and present a far greater risk of failure. The president had been instructed by Jarrett to inform Mr., Panetta that he would have sole discretion to act against the Osama Bin Laden compound. Jarrett believed this would further delay Panetta from acting, as the responsibility for failure would then fall almost entirely on him. What Valerie Jarrett, and the president, did not know is that Leon Panetta had already initiated a program that reported to him –and only him, involving a covert on the ground attack against the compound. Basically, the whole damn operation was already ready to go – including the specific team support Intel necessary to engage the enemy within hours of being given notice. Panetta then made plans to proceed with an on-ground assault. This information reached either Hillary Clinton or Robert Gates first (likely via military contacts directly associated with the impending mission) who then informed the other. Those two then met with Panetta, who informed each of them he had been given the authority by the president to proceed with a mission if the opportunity presented itself. Both Gates and Clinton warned Panetta of the implications of that authority – namely he was possibly being made into a scapegoat. Panetta admitted that possibility, but felt the opportunity to get Bin Laden outweighed that risk. During that meeting, Hillary Clinton was first to pledge her full support for Panetta, indicating she would defend him if necessary. Similar support was then followed by Gates. The following day, and with Panetta’s permission, Clinton met in private with Bill Daley and urged him to get the president’s full and open approval of the Panetta plan. Daley agreed such approval would be of great benefit to the action, and instructed Clinton to delay proceeding until he had secured that approval. Daley contacted Clinton within hours of their meeting indicating Jarrett refused to allow the president to give that approval. Daley then informed Clinton that he too would fully support Panetta in his actions, even if it meant disclosing the president’s indecision to the American public should that action fail to produce a successful conclusion. Clinton took that message back to Panetta and the CIA director initiated the 48 hour engagement order. At this point, the President of the United States was not informed of the engagement order – it did not originate from him, and for several hours after the order had been given and the special ops forces were preparing for action into Pakistan from their position in Afghanistan, Daley successfully kept Obama and Jarrett insulated from that order.

This insulation ended at some point with an abort order that I believe originated from Valerie Jarrett’s office, and was then followed up by President Obama. This abort order was later explained as a delay due to weather conditions, but the actual conditions at that time would have been acceptable for the mission. A storm system had been in the area earlier, but was no longer an issue. Check the data yourself to confirm. Jarrett, having been caught off guard, was now scrambling to determine who had initiated the plan. She was furious, repeating the acronym “CoC” and saying it was not being followed. This is where Bill Daley intervened directly. The particulars of that intervention are not clear to me beyond knowing he did meet with Jarrett in his office and following that meeting, Valerie Jarrett was not seen in the West Wing for some time, and apparently no longer offered up any resistance to the Osama Bin Laden mission. What did follow from there was one or more brief meetings between Bill Daley, Hillary Clinton, a representative from Robert Gates’ office, a representative from Leon Panetta’s office, and a representative from Jim Clapper’s office. I have to assume that these meetings were in essence, detailing the move to proceed with the operation against the Osama Bin Laden compound. I have been told by more than one source that Leon Panetta was directing the operation with both his own CIA operatives, as well as direct contacts with military – both entities were reporting to Panetta only at this point, and not the President of the United States.

There was not going to be another delay as had happened 24 hour earlier. The operation was at this time effectively unknown to President Barack Obama or Valerie Jarrett and it remained that way until AFTER it had already been initiated. President Obama was literally pulled from a golf outing and escorted back to the White House to be informed of the mission. Upon his arrival there was a briefing held which included Bill Daley, John Brennan, and a high ranking member of the military. When Obama emerged from the briefing, he was described as looking “very confused and uncertain.” The president was then placed in the situation room where several of the players in this event had already been watching the operation unfold.

Another interesting tidbit regarding this is that the Vice President was already “up to speed” on the operation. A source indicated they believe Hillary Clinton had personally made certain the Vice President was made aware of that day’s events before the president was. The now famous photo released shows the particulars of that of that room and its occupants. What that photo does not communicate directly is that the military personnel present in that room during the operation unfolding, deferred to either Hillary Clinton or Robert Gates. The president’s role was minimal, including their acknowledging of his presence in the room.
At the conclusion of the mission, after it had been repeatedly confirmed a success, President Obama was once again briefed behind closed doors. The only ones who went in that room besides the president were Bill Daley. John Brennan, and a third individual whose identity remains unknown to me. When leaving this briefing, the president came out of it “…much more confident. Much more certain of himself.” He was also carrying papers in his hand that quite possibly was the address to the nation given later that evening on the Bin Laden mission. The president did not have those papers with him prior to that briefing. The president then returned to the war room, where by this time, Leon Panetta had personally arrived and was receiving congratulations from all who were present.

In my initial communication to you of these events I described what unfolded as a temporary Coup initiated by high ranking intelligence and military officials. I stand by that term. These figures worked around the uncertainty of President Obama and the repeated resistance of Valerie Jarrett. If they had not been willing to do so, I am certain Osama Bin Laden would still be alive today. There will be no punishment to those who acted outside the authority of the president’s office. The president cannot afford to admit such a fact. What will be most interesting from here is to now see what becomes of Valerie Jarrett. One source indicated she is threatening resignation. I find that unlikely given my strong belief she needs the protection afforded her by the Oval Office and its immense powers to delay and eventually terminate investigations back in Chicago, but we shall see.

Read more:

While there is life, there is hope.