Wednesday, September 11, 2013


by Marshall Frank

This is purely a commentary by yours truly, my opinions about the looming WWIII that may likely follow any military strike we impose on the Syrian regime.

In many of the 540 or more blog articles I’ve posted over the last five years, I have dutifully tried to share what knowledge I’ve gained from the mountains of research conducted about the Muslim Brotherhood and its role on the global stage, including within our own country. Some readers choose to label me a right-wing nut who dismiss me as a surrogate of FOX News and Rush Limbaugh. Shallow thinking, indeed.

People are entitled to believe what they wish. My research began when I embarked on writing my book “Militant Islam In America,” which entailed studying three dozen books authored by intellectuals and experts on radical Islam and the political scene in our country. That, plus thousands of articles from hundreds of sources, some left, some right, some the product of knowledgeable experts in the field.

Here’s what I have learned.

The Muslim Brotherhood has one goal: World domination by fundamentalist Islam. And to accomplish that, they foster terror organizations, like HAMAS and al Qaeda. They also develop “peaceful” organizations to deceitfully and carefully appear “moderate” in the eyes of the media. More than 31 of those organizations are currently active in the United States with the expressed long range purpose of Islamizing the western hemisphere before the end of this century. They have infiltrated our educational systems, our colleges and universities, our legal systems, military, media, financial institutions and the government itself, much more so since the election of Barack Obama.

Written documents authored by the Muslim Brotherhood hierarchy (meant to be secretive and discovered by law enforcement agencies) call for the destruction of America “from within.” (See below for link)

Emphasis: From Within!

Early in the presidency of Barack Obama, I tried to alert readers with my suspicions that this man is no more of a Christian than Genghis Khan, He joined a so-called “Christian” church – headed by America hater Rev. Jeremiah Wright, cohort of Islamic leader, Louis Farrahkan – in order to present the facade of being Christian to secure voters, i.e. rise to power. Such was the reason he joined the Democratic Party, to fit within a supportive power base posing as a “liberal.”

After studying Obama’s history, including associates and influences from birth, to college, to politics, it is my opinion that his primary mission on earth is aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood, and has been since the 1980’s and 90’s. He must be highly cautious to steer his image in other directions. Americans, sadly, are gullible enough to believe everything he says.

This assessment personifies the “from within” that the Muslim Brotherhood has promised to deploy when the manisfesto was authored in the 1991.

All other matters, to Mr. Obama, are secondary. He is play-acting the role of president as his close advisors make most decisions. His goal is to weaken the United States militarily, economically, and morally, for which he has succeeded. More than anything, he must say and do everything possible to gain and retain power. That entails the creation of an entitlement society so that government dependents amass an insurmountable power base. He is a master at photo ops and speech making, most of which he hasn’t a clue what to say until he reads the prompter.

He has employed Islamists in the White House, the Justice Department, the State Department and more, many of whom have been associated with the Muslim Brotherhood. He has ordered the de-emphasis of “Islam” in federal law enforcement and military training, as it relates to international terror. He would not even allow the Ft. Hood massacre to be labeled correctly; “Islamic terror.” Barack Obama is a blessing to the radical Islamic propaganda machine.

Hindsight being 20/20, the middle-east crises of the last 32 months becomes crystal clear. Every word, and every action he has taken in regards to all the uprisings in the middle-east, including Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and Syria, has been to the benefit and support of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Bear in mind, this began halfway into his first term. The Muslim Brotherhood knew they had an ally in the White House, though that could possibly change with the election of 2012. Thus, there was no time to waste. The uprisings – which we stupidly believed was an “Arab Spring” – had to begin in early 2011 in case a new president took office in 2013 who would not be their ally. Of course, it worked out for the Muslim Brotherhood, Obama was reelected.

Obama called for the removal of Mubarak, our 30-year ally, knowing the Muslim Brotherhood was poised to seize power. He deployed American military strikes in Libya to help the Muslim Brotherhood get rid of Ghadaffi. Remember, while Mubarak, Ghadaffi and Assad have been heavy handed dictators, they all outlawed the Muslim Brotherhood because they knew what they stood for: Extreme fundamentalism and a return to 7th century Sharia systems.

The Benghazi fiasco, resulting in the deaths of four Americans, reeks to high heaven from day one. Since, the administration tactics have been to ignore the situation long enough hoping it’ll go away. There is outrageous corruption associated with Benghazi, and – in my opinion – is likely related to the Muslim Brotherhood and its covert shipping of arms to the Syrian rebels via the American ambassador. Obama is always on the side of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Now comes Obama’s frenetic push for strikes against Syria’s Assad because he allegedly used chemical weapons to kill a lot of kids. Here are my calculations about that:

It’s ludicrous to suppose that Assad would deploy such weapons in the eyes of the world when they are actually winning the war, knowing it might draw a severe retaliation. It makes NO SENSE.
There is evidence to suggest – much more logical – that chemical weapons were covertly used by forces among the rebels, i.e. al Qaeda, in order draw support from the United States…which in reality, would be in support of the Muslim Brotherhood. If Kerry and Obama made their argument strong enough, people might actually believe it was the doings of Assad.
Obama is between a rock and hard place. Thus, the reason for the fa├žade about seeking support from Congress. If he gets the support, he could blame congress for any of the disastrous fallout. In the meanwhile, there would be a regime change that favors the Muslim Brotherhood. If he does not get the support from congress, he will have an excuse to sell his friends in the Muslim Brotherhood.
This, along with Egypt and Benghazi, have become a tougher sell than he ever imagined.

Have no doubts. Everything happening over there is perpetuated for and by the Muslim Brotherhood. They are making their big move, the proverbial “hail Mary,” essential for establishing the future caliphate they promised in 1928.

In September of 2001, we were attacked by terrorists who were led by a former prodigy of the Muslim Brotherhood: Osama Bin Laden. Only seven years later, we elected a friend of the Muslim Brotherhood to run the country they have promised to destroy.

That’s how I connect the dots. It is clear.

I have backed it up with numerous articles in the last five years, the one most comprehensive of which is linked below.

Meanwhile, hear is the Manifesto of the Brotherhood, read in English starting on page 17:

Click here:

This article received more responses than any article I ever posted. It was also read on National Radio.

Click here: A MOSAIC: OBAMA, ISLAM, COMMUNISM | Marshall Frank

Click here: BENGHAZIGATE: Obama’s Secret Gun-Running Program –

And for a treat, spare eleven minutes to watch this stab-in-the-heart narrative by Judge Jeanine. At the very end she asks, “Mr President, you received a Nobel Peace Prize? Give it back!” She puts it together better than anyone.

Click here: ? Judge Jeanine Pirro Opening Statement -Benghazi, Syria, Obama’s Red Line & Credibility – 9-7-2013 – YouTube

Sunday, September 01, 2013


Interview with Amil Imani

As an apostate his mission is to raise the clarion call about the imminent and present danger of expansionistic theocratic Islam. Having witnessed first-hand the horrors and indignity that Islamofascism visits on people it subjugates, he has taken it upon himself to do his part in defeating this ideology of oppression, hate and violence.


When and why did you get involved in the anti-Islamic movement?
My confrontation with Islam actually began early in life when I encountered so many Islamic beliefs and practices. Born in a Muslim family and enveloped by an Islamic society, I needed to find my own identity and path in life. A great many things about Islam clashed with beliefs that I cherished. Namely, those of the longstanding, life loving, and egalitarianism of my ancient pre-Islamic people.
Islamophobia is an irrational fear or prejudice towards Islam and Muslims. Are you an irrational Islamophobe?
All phobias are, by definition, irrational fears. I’m not an Islamophobe, because my “fear” of Islam is completely rational. Avoiding a poisonous snake is a rational fear. Not a phobia. The emotion of fear, when utilized rationally, is of immense value. The key point is that the person, as well as the society, must base their assessment on facts. My assessment of Islam, conclusively supported by indisputable facts, is that it is a dangerous destructive and death-bearing belief system of a long ago savage people that has inflicted and continues to inflict misery and death to people.

Did you receive any threats from Muslims or others because of your involvement in the anti-Islamic movement or because of your apostasy?
Yes. But I ignore them. I will speak the truth about Islam. In no way am I falsely defaming Islam. Islam is own best defamer. Speaking the truth usually entails risks. I’m well aware of that.
Sharia law stipulates that any Muslim who turns his back on Islam should be given a chance to revert to the religion. For an un-repenting male apostate, death is the punishment and life imprisonment for a female apostate.
“Kill whoever changes his religion.” __Sahih al-Bukhari 9:84:57

What aspects of Islam do you find most problematic and disturbing?
To answer this question properly, volumes can be written. Just a few keywords should cue you for now. Intolerance, fatalism, institutionalized slavery, injustice, jihadism, oppression of women and non-Muslims, celebration of death, lack of respect for individualism, rejection of freedom and democracy, belief in the theocracy of Allah as ministered by the self-serving clergy who are not accountable to the people, stifling of questioning and inquiry, disallowing all legitimate forms of freedom, and on and on.

Do you think Israel is a good ally in the struggle against Islamization?
Yes, absolutely. Now, Israel is a sovereign state but hardly safe. She is surrounded by nations and peoples who are bent on her destruction. It is tragic that her neighbors and she has not been able to find an equitable way of living side-by-side with mutual respect and in peace. I earnestly hope that ways can be found for a peaceful resolution to this destructive impasse.

Who is a moderate Muslim?
It is wishful thinking on the part of the non-Muslims to believe that one can be a Muslim moderate, given that Islam is radical to its very core. To be a moderate Muslim demands that the person explicitly renounce much of the violent, exclusionary, and radical teachings of the Quran. A moderate Muslim is someone who is Muslim in name only.
A moderate Muslim is not a true Muslim. If in any way and to any extent a person supports Islam or carries out its stone-age precepts, then he/she is Muslim. There is no such as thing as moderate Muslims. There are, however, some moderate people who consider themselves Muslims. These people are not sure who they are. They are in a limbo and suffer from an identity crisis.

How do you see the future with current immigration policies? And what needs to be changed?
I have always believed that being a Muslim and being American are incompatible. A Muslim is an Ummahist. His loyalty, first and above all, to the Islamic world rule and not to his country. By allowing Muslims to immigrate to the West, we are literally inviting the biggest enemy of mankind into our homes. Because, Muslims do not assimilate, they come here to make Islam the law of the land.

What do you see as the biggest challenge when it comes to informing people about the dangers of Islamization?
The biggest danger is being seen as racist. Also, lawsuits and other forms of intimidations by rich powerful Muslim organizations impede an individual to come forward and tell the truth. Personal threats of harm and even death fall into this category.

What do you say to people calling you a racist or a Nazi because you oppose Islamization?
They are entitled to their views. I want them to enjoy freedom of expression as long as allow me and others to present the non-sanitized true version of Islam. Islam isn’t a race, so critics of Islam cannot be racists.

Do you think mainstream media is pro-Islam biased?
Certainly. And part of the bias is driven by financial gains from advertising and the real fear of losing advertising when an advertiser, under pressure from an Islamic organization threatens to boycott their products.
Muslims want to use Sharia (Islamic law).

In what way does it clash with our Western civilization and our laws?
This is another book in itself. Read my past writings on my web site. Muslims, under the banner of religion, are infringing blatantly on the rights of others, not only in Islamic countries, but also in much of the non-Muslim world. By their acts of dogmatic savagery, Muslims are finally awakening non-Muslim democracies to the imminent threat of Islamofascism keen on destroying their free secular societies.

Living in America, what can you tell us about the ongoing Islamization of the country?
Islamization is just as dangerous as Hitlerism and worse than communism. As more and more Muslims arrive in non-Islamic lands, as they reproduce with great fecundity, as they convert the disenchanted and minorities, and as the petrodollar-flush Muslims and Muslim treasuries supply generous funds, Muslims gather more power to undermine democratic rule. A consortium composed of pandering politicians, blinded with short-term self-interest and egoism; attention and fund-seeking self-proclaimed prima donna professors; and, bastions of useful idiot liberals, universities, is the witting or unwitting promoter of Ummah-ism.

Is Islam a religion of peace?
No, it has never been a religion of peace. What we need to do is demand that politicians, Islamic apologists, and paid-for media do not abuse freedom by lying about Islam. When these people portray Islam as a religion of peace, they are lying through their teeth. Just take a quick look at Islam’s history as well as what is happening today in the Islamic lands. Islam is not a religion of peace and it has never been. Islam is violent, oppressive, racist, and irrational at its very core. It is treachery for people to present it as otherwise, either out of ignorance or because of their own personal reasons.


Links worth your time